On February 7, 2025 President Trump fired Colleen Shogan as head of the National Archives and Records Administration, marking the first time a sitting president has removed the National Archivist since the position was established in the 1930s. The firing represented an unprecedented assertion of presidential authority over an independent federal agency responsible for preserving and presenting American historical records and cultural heritage. While Trump cited the Archives’ role in the classified documents investigation, the removal occurred amid ongoing controversy over Shogan’s October 2024 directive to staff to remove or minimize exhibits on slavery, civil rights leaders, Japanese-American internment, and Indigenous displacement. Historians and civil rights organizations condemned the firing as political interference in a nonpartisan cultural institution responsible for safeguarding the nation’s historical record.

In response to Executive Order 14151 (January 20, 2025), which mandated termination of all federal DEI programs and equity-related grants, the NEA cancelled its Challenge America grant program on February 6, 2025. Challenge America had supported small arts organizations serving underserved communities. The NEA revised its 2026 grant guidelines to prohibit DEI programs and “gender ideology,” prioritize America250 projects, and require a five-year organizational history. Organizations with pending applications were required to resubmit under the new criteria. Critics condemned the changes as censorship that imposed ideological conditions on arts funding. The ACLU and several other organizations filed suit against the NEA over its cancellation of funding arguing that The lawsuit argues that the grant-guidance restrictions—particularly the requirement that applicants avoid “promoting gender ideology”—unconstitutionally violate the First Amendment and exceed the agency’s lawful authority.

أمر تنفيذي رقم 14188، الموقع في 29 يناير/كانون الثاني 2025، وجه الوكالات الفيدرالية إلى تحديد السلطات المختصة بمكافحة معاداة السامية، وتضمن أحكاما تقضي بأن تراقب الجامعات أنشطة الطلاب غير المواطنين التي قد تؤدي إلى إجراءات الترحيل وتبلغ عنها. لا يقيد نص الأمر صراحة الحرية الفنية أو الترحيل المباشر. لكن السلطات الفيدرالية استخدمت الأمر ذريعة لتقييد التعبير المشروع والسلمي للطلاب المشاركين في الاحتجاجات الجامعية. ألغت السلطات أكثر من 1500 تأشيرة دراسية دولية في ما لا يقل عن 32 ولاية واعتقلت العديد من الطلاب المشاركين في المظاهرات المؤيدة لفلسطين. طعنت منظمات الحريات المدنية في هذه الإجراءات باعتبارها انتهاكات غير دستورية لحقوق حرية التعبير والتجمع.

President Trump signed an executive order requiring federal contractors and grantees, cultural institutions, to certify that they do not operate DEI programs that violate federal anti-discrimination laws. The order revoked longstanding affirmative action requirements for federal contractors and directed agencies to combat DEI initiatives in the private sector. Critics warned the order’s vague language would create a chilling effect on diversity programming and cultural perspectives in federally funded institutions. The executive order has been challenged in court on the grounds that its restrictions on DEI-related programs and requirements for “merit-based” practices unlawfully suppress protected expression and discriminate against organizations engaging in equity-focused work.

وقع الرئيس ترامب على أمر تنفيذي يلغي الحماية الفيدرالية للهوية الجنسية في برامج التعليم والصحة والثقافة. وصدرت تعليمات للوكالات بتعريف الجنس "بشكل صارم على أنه بيولوجي"، مما أدى إلى إلغاء السياسات الشاملة في المتاحف والمكتبات والمساحات الثقافية المدعومة من الحكومة الفيدرالية. يقيّد الأمر التمويل لأي شيء يستخدم مصطلح "أيديولوجية الجنس" أو يشير إلى "الجنس" بدلاً من "الجنس البيولوجي"، مما سيحد من المؤسسات الفنية والثقافية وكذلك المنظمات غير الحكومية الفنية، حيث إن هذه المصطلحات شائعة في المشاريع الفنية وفي أبحاث تاريخ الفن. حذرت منظمات LGBTQ+ من أن هذا سيؤدي إلى تقييد التعبير الفني والعام المرتبط بالهوية الكويرية. في فبراير 2025، رفعت الرابطة الحضرية الوطنية دعوى قضائية ضد الأمر التنفيذي 14168، بحجة أن القيود التي تفرضها الإدارة على سياسات التنوع والإنصاف والاندماج (DEI) والهوية الجنسية تنتهك حماية الحقوق المدنية وحقوق حرية التعبير.

A presidential memorandum directed the Administrator of the General Services Administration to submit recommendations promoting “classical and traditional” architectural styles for federal buildings. The directive discouraged contemporary architectural designs and called for revisions to federal architecture guidelines. The Society of Architectural Historians argued that the policy would impose rigid aesthetic preferences, disregard local artistic and architectural contexts, stifle design innovation, and limit artistic freedom.

Executive Order 14151, signed January 20, 2025, directed all federal agencies to terminate “all discriminatory programs, including illegal DEI and ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities,” as well as all “equity-related” grants and contracts within 60 days. The order had implications for arts and culture agencies that receive federal funding, as it required them to review and revise grant programs and compliance requirements. Arts organizations expressed uncertainty over how the order would affect their eligibility for federal funding and which programs might be subject to termination. Executive Order 14151 has been challenged in court on First Amendment grounds, with plaintiffs arguing that its restrictions on DEI-related programs amount to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and suppression of protected speech.

President Trump issued an executive order reforming the federal accreditation process for higher education institutions. The order directed accrediting bodies to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) standards, which the administration characterized as “unlawful discrimination,” and to prioritize “intellectual diversity” among faculty. It instructed the Secretary of Education to investigate and potentially terminate accreditors that require DEI-related practices or who fail to maintain and “intellectually diverse” staff. Academic organizations warned the order could lead to government interference in institutional decision-making at universities, raising concerns about restrictions on cultural programming and curricula, particularly those addressing diversity, race, and gender.