-
February 7, 2025
Трамп уволил главу Национального архива
PolicyCultural rightsFreedom of expressionRacial justiceParties affected: National Archives and Records Administration
ПросмотрOn February 7, 2025 President Trump fired Colleen Shogan as head of the National Archives and Records Administration, marking the first time a sitting president has removed the National Archivist since the position was established in the 1930s. The firing represented an unprecedented assertion of presidential authority over an independent federal agency responsible for preserving and presenting American historical records and cultural heritage. While Trump cited the Archives’ role in the classified documents investigation, the removal occurred amid ongoing controversy over Shogan’s October 2024 directive to staff to remove or minimize exhibits on slavery, civil rights leaders, Japanese-American internment, and Indigenous displacement. Historians and civil rights organizations condemned the firing as political interference in a nonpartisan cultural institution responsible for safeguarding the nation’s historical record.
-
February 6, 2025
Руководство NEA по грантам для программ в области искусства
PolicyCultural rightsFreedom of expressionRacial justiceParties affected: All cultural institutions involved in grant-making
ПросмотрIn response to Executive Order 14151 (January 20, 2025), which mandated termination of all federal DEI programs and equity-related grants, the NEA cancelled its Challenge America grant program on February 6, 2025. Challenge America had supported small arts organizations serving underserved communities. The NEA revised its 2026 grant guidelines to prohibit DEI programs and “gender ideology,” prioritize America250 projects, and require a five-year organizational history. Organizations with pending applications were required to resubmit under the new criteria. Critics condemned the changes as censorship that imposed ideological conditions on arts funding. The ACLU and several other organizations filed suit against the NEA over its cancellation of funding arguing that The lawsuit argues that the grant-guidance restrictions—particularly the requirement that applicants avoid “promoting gender ideology”—unconstitutionally violate the First Amendment and exceed the agency’s lawful authority.
-
29 января 2025 года
Дополнительные меры по борьбе с антисемитизмом (EO: 14188)
PolicyFreedom of expressionLGBTQ+ rightsRacial justiceParties affected: U.S. Universities, non-citizen students
ПросмотрУказ № 14188, подписанный 29 января 2025 года, предписывал федеральным агентствам определить органы, ответственные за борьбу с антисемитизмом, и содержал положения, обязывающие университеты отслеживать и сообщать о деятельности студентов-неграждан, которая может привести к процедуре высылки. Текст указа не содержит явных ограничений свободы искусства или прямых указаний на депортацию. Однако федеральные власти использовали указ как повод для ограничения законного и мирного выражения мнения студентами, участвующими в протестах на территории кампуса. Власти аннулировали более 1500 виз иностранных студентов по меньшей мере в 32 штатах и задержали нескольких студентов, участвовавших в пропалестинских демонстрациях. Организации по защите гражданских свобод оспорили эти действия как неконституционные нарушения прав на свободу слова и собраний.
-
21 января 2025 года
Прекращение незаконной дискриминации и восстановление равных возможностей на основе заслуг (EO: 14173)
ПолитикаСвобода выраженияParties affected: All federal agencies and employees
ПросмотрPresident Trump signed an executive order requiring federal contractors and grantees, cultural institutions, to certify that they do not operate DEI programs that violate federal anti-discrimination laws. The order revoked longstanding affirmative action requirements for federal contractors and directed agencies to combat DEI initiatives in the private sector. Critics warned the order’s vague language would create a chilling effect on diversity programming and cultural perspectives in federally funded institutions. The executive order has been challenged in court on the grounds that its restrictions on DEI-related programs and requirements for “merit-based” practices unlawfully suppress protected expression and discriminate against organizations engaging in equity-focused work.
-
21 января 2025 года
Защита женщин от экстремизма гендерной идеологии и восстановление биологической правды (EO: 14168)
PolicyAcademic freedomCultural rightsFreedom of expressionLGBTQ+ rightsParties affected: All federal agencies
ПросмотрПрезидент Трамп подписал указ, отменяющий федеральную защиту гендерной идентичности в сфере образования, здравоохранения и культурных программ. Агентствам было предписано определять пол «строго как биологический», что привело к отмене инклюзивной политики в музеях, библиотеках и культурных пространствах, поддерживаемых федеральным правительством. Указ ограничивает финансирование всего, что использует термин «гендерная идеология» или упоминает «гендер» вместо «пол», что ограничит деятельность художественных и культурных учреждений, а также художественных НПО, поскольку эти термины широко используются в художественных проектах и исследованиях по истории искусства. ЛГБТК+ организации предупредили, что это охладит художественное и публичное самовыражение, связанное с квир-идентичностью. В феврале 2025 года Национальная городская лига подала иск против EO 14168, argumenting the administration’s restrictions on DEI and gender-identity policies violate civil-rights protections and free-speech rights.
-
January 20, 2025
Продвижение красивой федеральной гражданской архитектуры (президентский меморандум)
PolicyCultural rightsFreedom of expressionFederal architecture and construction
ПросмотрA presidential memorandum directed the Administrator of the General Services Administration to submit recommendations promoting “classical and traditional” architectural styles for federal buildings. The directive discouraged contemporary architectural designs and called for revisions to federal architecture guidelines. The Society of Architectural Historians argued that the policy would impose rigid aesthetic preferences, disregard local artistic and architectural contexts, stifle design innovation, and limit artistic freedom.
-
January 20, 2025
Прекращение радикальных и расточительных государственных программ DEI и преференций (EO: 14151)
PolicyCultural rightsFreedom of expressionLGBTQ+ rightsRacial justiceВсе федеральные агентства
ПросмотрExecutive Order 14151, signed January 20, 2025, directed all federal agencies to terminate “all discriminatory programs, including illegal DEI and ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities,” as well as all “equity-related” grants and contracts within 60 days. The order had implications for arts and culture agencies that receive federal funding, as it required them to review and revise grant programs and compliance requirements. Arts organizations expressed uncertainty over how the order would affect their eligibility for federal funding and which programs might be subject to termination. Executive Order 14151 has been challenged in court on First Amendment grounds, with plaintiffs arguing that its restrictions on DEI-related programs amount to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and suppression of protected speech.
-
January 20, 2025
Реформирование аккредитации для укрепления высшего образования (EO 14279)
PolicyAcademic freedomCultural rightsFreedom of expressionLGBTQ+ rightsRacial justiceParties affected: U.S. universities
ПросмотрPresident Trump issued an executive order reforming the federal accreditation process for higher education institutions. The order directed accrediting bodies to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) standards, which the administration characterized as “unlawful discrimination,” and to prioritize “intellectual diversity” among faculty. It instructed the Secretary of Education to investigate and potentially terminate accreditors that require DEI-related practices or who fail to maintain and “intellectually diverse” staff. Academic organizations warned the order could lead to government interference in institutional decision-making at universities, raising concerns about restrictions on cultural programming and curricula, particularly those addressing diversity, race, and gender.