پرش به محتوا
اهدا کنید

پست‌های یافت شده

همه مقالات

  • February 7, 2025

    ترامپ رئیس آرشیو ملی را برکنار کرد

    PolicyCultural rightsFreedom of expressionRacial justice

    Parties affected: National Archives and Records Administration

    On February 7, 2025 President Trump fired Colleen Shogan as head of the National Archives and Records Administration, marking the first time a sitting president has removed the National Archivist since the position was established in the 1930s. The firing represented an unprecedented assertion of presidential authority over an independent federal agency responsible for preserving and presenting American historical records and cultural heritage. While Trump cited the Archives’ role in the classified documents investigation, the removal occurred amid ongoing controversy over Shogan’s October 2024 directive to staff to remove or minimize exhibits on slavery, civil rights leaders, Japanese-American internment, and Indigenous displacement. Historians and civil rights organizations condemned the firing as political interference in a nonpartisan cultural institution responsible for safeguarding the nation’s historical record.

    مشاهده
  • February 6, 2025

    راهنمایی NEA در مورد کمک هزینه برای برنامه‌های هنری

    PolicyCultural rightsFreedom of expressionRacial justice

    Parties affected: All cultural institutions involved in grant-making

    In response to Executive Order 14151 (January 20, 2025), which mandated termination of all federal DEI programs and equity-related grants, the NEA cancelled its Challenge America grant program on February 6, 2025. Challenge America had supported small arts organizations serving underserved communities. The NEA revised its 2026 grant guidelines to prohibit DEI programs and “gender ideology,” prioritize America250 projects, and require a five-year organizational history. Organizations with pending applications were required to resubmit under the new criteria. Critics condemned the changes as censorship that imposed ideological conditions on arts funding. The ACLU and several other organizations filed suit against the NEA over its cancellation of funding arguing that The lawsuit argues that the grant-guidance restrictions—particularly the requirement that applicants avoid “promoting gender ideology”—unconstitutionally violate the First Amendment and exceed the agency’s lawful authority.

    مشاهده
  • ۲۹ ژانویه ۲۰۲۵

    اقدامات تکمیلی برای مبارزه با یهودستیزی (EO: 14188)

    PolicyFreedom of expressionLGBTQ+ rightsRacial justice

    Parties affected: U.S. Universities, non-citizen students

    فرمان اجرایی ۱۴۱۸۸ که در ۲۹ ژانویه ۲۰۲۵ امضا شد، به سازمان‌های فدرال دستور داد تا مقاماتی را برای مبارزه با یهودستیزی شناسایی کنند و شامل مقرراتی برای دانشگاه‌ها بود تا فعالیت‌های دانشجویان غیرشهروند را که می‌تواند منجر به مراحل اخراج شود، نظارت و گزارش کنند. متن این فرمان صراحتاً آزادی هنری یا اخراج مستقیم را محدود نمی‌کند. با این حال، مقامات فدرال از این فرمان به عنوان بهانه‌ای برای محدود کردن بیان مشروع و مسالمت‌آمیز دانشجویان شرکت‌کننده در اعتراضات دانشگاه‌ها استفاده کرده‌اند. مقامات بیش از ۱۵۰۰ ویزای دانشجویی بین‌المللی را در حداقل ۳۲ ایالت لغو کردند و چندین دانشجوی شرکت‌کننده در تظاهرات طرفدار فلسطین را بازداشت کردند. سازمان‌های آزادی‌های مدنی این اقدامات را به عنوان نقض خلاف قانون اساسی آزادی بیان و حقوق تجمع به چالش کشیده‌اند.

    مشاهده
  • ۲۱ ژانویه ۲۰۲۵

    پایان دادن به تبعیض غیرقانونی و احیای فرصت‌های مبتنی بر شایستگی (EO: 14173)

    سیاست آزادی بیان

    Parties affected: All federal agencies and employees

    President Trump signed an executive order requiring federal contractors and grantees, cultural institutions, to certify that they do not operate DEI programs that violate federal anti-discrimination laws. The order revoked longstanding affirmative action requirements for federal contractors and directed agencies to combat DEI initiatives in the private sector. Critics warned the order’s vague language would create a chilling effect on diversity programming and cultural perspectives in federally funded institutions. The executive order has been challenged in court on the grounds that its restrictions on DEI-related programs and requirements for “merit-based” practices unlawfully suppress protected expression and discriminate against organizations engaging in equity-focused work.

    مشاهده
  • ۲۱ ژانویه ۲۰۲۵

    دفاع از زنان در برابر افراط‌گرایی ایدئولوژی جنسیتی و احیای حقیقت بیولوژیکی (EO: 14168)

    PolicyAcademic freedomCultural rightsFreedom of expressionLGBTQ+ rights

    Parties affected: All federal agencies

    رئیس جمهور ترامپ یک فرمان اجرایی امضا کرد که حمایت‌های فدرال از هویت جنسیتی در برنامه‌های آموزشی، بهداشتی و فرهنگی را لغو می‌کرد. به آژانس‌ها دستور داده شد که جنسیت را «صرفاً به عنوان یک امر بیولوژیکی» تعریف کنند، که منجر به حذف سیاست‌های فراگیر در موزه‌ها، کتابخانه‌ها و فضاهای فرهنگی تحت حمایت فدرال شد. این فرمان، بودجه هر چیزی را که از اصطلاح «ایدئولوژی جنسیتی» استفاده می‌کند یا به جای «جنسیت» به «جنسیت» اشاره دارد، محدود می‌کند، که این امر مؤسسات هنری و فرهنگی و همچنین سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد هنری را محدود می‌کند، زیرا این اصطلاحات رایج در پروژه‌های هنری و تحقیقات تاریخ هنر هستند. سازمان‌های LGBTQ+ هشدار دادند که این امر بیان هنری و عمومی مرتبط با هویت کوئیر را تضعیف می‌کند. در فوریه 2025، اتحادیه ملی شهری علیه فرمان اجرایی 14168 شکایت کرد و استدلال کرد که محدودیت‌های دولت بر DEI و سیاست‌های هویت جنسیتی، حمایت‌های حقوق مدنی و حقوق آزادی بیان را نقض می‌کند.

    مشاهده
  • January 20, 2025

    ترویج معماری زیبای شهری فدرال (یادداشت ریاست جمهوری)

    PolicyCultural rightsFreedom of expression

    Federal architecture and construction

    A presidential memorandum directed the Administrator of the General Services Administration to submit recommendations promoting “classical and traditional” architectural styles for federal buildings. The directive discouraged contemporary architectural designs and called for revisions to federal architecture guidelines. The Society of Architectural Historians argued that the policy would impose rigid aesthetic preferences, disregard local artistic and architectural contexts, stifle design innovation, and limit artistic freedom.

    مشاهده
  • January 20, 2025

    پایان دادن به برنامه‌های رادیکال و بی‌فایده DEI دولتی و ترجیح دادن آنها (EO: 14151)

    PolicyCultural rightsFreedom of expressionLGBTQ+ rightsRacial justice

    همه آژانس‌های فدرال

    Executive Order 14151, signed January 20, 2025, directed all federal agencies to terminate “all discriminatory programs, including illegal DEI and ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities,” as well as all “equity-related” grants and contracts within 60 days. The order had implications for arts and culture agencies that receive federal funding, as it required them to review and revise grant programs and compliance requirements. Arts organizations expressed uncertainty over how the order would affect their eligibility for federal funding and which programs might be subject to termination. Executive Order 14151 has been challenged in court on First Amendment grounds, with plaintiffs arguing that its restrictions on DEI-related programs amount to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and suppression of protected speech.

    مشاهده
  • January 20, 2025

    اصلاح اعتباربخشی برای تقویت آموزش عالی (EO 14279)

    PolicyAcademic freedomCultural rightsFreedom of expressionLGBTQ+ rightsRacial justice

    Parties affected: U.S. universities

    President Trump issued an executive order reforming the federal accreditation process for higher education institutions. The order directed accrediting bodies to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) standards, which the administration characterized as “unlawful discrimination,” and to prioritize “intellectual diversity” among faculty. It instructed the Secretary of Education to investigate and potentially terminate accreditors that require DEI-related practices or who fail to maintain and “intellectually diverse” staff. Academic organizations warned the order could lead to government interference in institutional decision-making at universities, raising concerns about restrictions on cultural programming and curricula, particularly those addressing diversity, race, and gender.

    مشاهده