Skip To Content
Donate
Global Policy & Advocacy

Artistic Freedom Monitor USA

Artistic Freedom Monitor USA is a first-of-its-kind tracking and accountability initiative documenting government actions that threaten artistic freedom and the independence of cultural institutions in the United States. The AFM is led by Artistic Freedom Initiative, with support from our partners at Democracy Forward, Human Rights First, and the Pro Bono Programs at Stanford Law School and UC Berkeley Law School.

Why We Launched the Monitor

Launched in response to an escalating wave of censorship, politicized funding decisions, and ideological interference in cultural life, AFM USA makes visible how federal and state authorities are restricting artistic and cultural expression protected under the First Amendment and international human rights law. These measures—ranging from content-based restrictions and governance interference to immigration barriers for artists—pose serious risks not only to artists and cultural institutions, but to democratic accountability itself.

State Level Inferences

Hover over any state on the map to discover executive actions, laws, and policies that impact artistic freedom.

November 20, 2025

State Board Policy Amendment — Restriction on Library Materials

Alabama Policy Cultural rights

Parties affected: Public libraries

On November 20, 2025, the Alabama Public Library Service Board approved an amendment to its administrative code prohibiting children’s and youth library sections from including any materials that address “transgender procedures, gender ideology or the concept of more than two biological genders.” The policy was adopted after a public comment period and applies to more than 200 public libraries across Alabama. The amendment requires libraries to re-evaluate and relocate books that fall under the rule’s definitions to adult sections or remove them entirely, with implementation beginning in 2026. Libraries that fail to comply with the administrative code face loss of state funding.

View
March 20, 2025

Funding paused by the Alabama Public Library Service board

Alabama Policy Cultural rights

Parties affected: Fairhope Public Library

The APLS board voted to suspend approximately $42,000 in annual state funding for Fairhope Public Library after parents complained that books `remained in the teen section that they deemed sexually explicit or inappropriate. This marked the first enforcement action under administrative code changes adopted in 2024 that require libraries to relocate sexually explicit or inappropriate materials from all minor sections to adult sections in order to receive state funding. The library had implemented partial compliance measures including parental consent forms and relocating some materials, but APLS determined these efforts insufficient because books remained accessible to minors aged 13-17 in the teen section. APLS Board is chaired by John Wahl, who simultaneously serves as chair of the Alabama Republican Party, and the funding suspension was initiated by board member Amy Minton, who is running for Alabama Senate and explicitly cited Trump’s executive order on gender and Alabama’s “What Is A Woman” Act as justification. APLS board member Ron Snider accused Wahl and others of “promoting an agenda of censorship” targeting books with LGBTQ+ themes.

View
June 30, 2025

State Budget Appropriation — Denial of Grant Funding

Florida Policy Cultural rights

Parties affected: Arts and cultural organizations in Leon, Gadsden, and Jefferson Counties

Governor DeSantis signed Florida’s FY 2025-26 state budget, which included only $1.1 million in arts and culture grant funding for Leon, Gadsden, and Jefferson Counties—a sharp reduction from the $2.6 million requested by 46 applicants. Only 12 of 46 projects received funding, with 29 organizations receiving no state grants. Organizations such as the Tallahassee Ballet, Tallahassee Symphony Orchestra, and 621 Gallery faced significant funding shortfalls for the second consecutive year, forcing consideration of staff layoffs and programming cuts. The reduced funding was part of DeSantis’s restructuring of statewide arts grants following his complete elimination of arts funding the previous year, which he justified by targeting festivals with LGBTQ+ content he called “sexual.” In proposing the FY 2025-26 budget, DeSantis stated the previous veto was because arts funding was “too much into the DEI, into the woke stuff,” and mandated the new funding go only to “family friendly” programs “appropriate for all age groups.” The final budget implemented a stricter scoring system requiring organizations to score 95 or higher, which excluded over 700 arts organizations statewide that typically receive state support.

View
February 24, 2025

Executive Order: Ensuring Government Efficiency

Florida Policy Academic freedom

Parties affected: All state agencies, universities, and local governments

Governor DeSantis issued Executive Order 25-44 establishing a Department of Government Efficiency task force to audit state agencies, universities, and local governments for “unnecessary spending, programs, courses, staff, and inefficiencies.” DeSantis stated that “ideological” courses and majors may be discontinued and threatened to “hold accountable” universities found circumventing Florida’s existing DEI ban through recharacterization. The order requires universities to submit six years of records on staffing, research grants, course syllabi, and programming, with on-campus visits to “ensure full compliance” with state law.

View
October 6, 2025

State Library System Guidelines — Restricting “Banned Books Week” Displays

Hawaiʻi Policy Cultural rights

Parties affected: Hawaiʻi State Public Library System

The Hawaii State Public Library System issued new guidelines prohibiting the use of the words “censorship” and “banned,” the phrase “Banned Books Week,” and any materials from the American Library Association in displays at all 51 public libraries statewide. The guidelines also banned certain props like caution tape and fake flames, effectively rebranding the national Banned Books Week observance as “Freedom to Read Week.” State Librarian Stacey Aldrich defended the guidelines as an attempt to be “inclusive of all library patrons,” though librarians reported the restrictions to the ALA and critics argued they undermine intellectual freedom awareness during a week dedicated to highlighting book censorship.

View
February 28, 2025

Governor signed Senate File 418, removing “gender identity” from Iowa’s Civil Rights Act

Iowa Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: All residents protected under Iowa Civil Rights Act

Iowa Governor Reynolds signed Senate File 418, removing “gender identity” from protected classes under the Iowa Civil Rights Act, eliminating legal safeguards against discrimination in employment, housing, education, credit, and public accommodations effective July 1, 2025. The law permits cultural institutions including universities, museums, libraries, and arts organizations and other private and public entities to refuse to hire, serve, or admit transgender individuals without state-level legal consequence, limiting access to cultural sites, archives, and educational materials. While federal protections under Title VII continue for some employment contexts, transgender Iowans face credible risks of exclusion from participation in cultural life. With this ruling, Iowa became the first state to statutorily repeal a protected class from its civil rights law.

View
March 28, 2025

Enactment of House Bill 4, Banning DEI Programs at Public Universities

Kentucky Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public Universities

On March 28, 2025, Kentucky enacted House Bill 4 after the legislature overrode Governor Beshear’s veto, prohibiting public universities from expending resources on DEI offices, programs, or staff positions, with a compliance deadline of June 30, 2025. The law prompted institutions including the University of Louisville, University of Kentucky, and Northern Kentucky University to cancel identity-based cultural graduation ceremonies for LGBTQ+ and Black students and disband employee resource groups that facilitated cultural networking. The legislation also restricts courses whose primary purpose is deemed to “indoctrinate participants with a discriminatory concept,” raising concerns among educators about impacts on cultural studies curricula. Universities have removed diversity-related signage and closed DEI offices to comply with the ban.

View
April 14, 2025

Enactment of House Bill 1193

Mississippi Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public K–12 schools, state-supported institutions, community colleges, and universities

Governor Tate Reeves signed HB 1193 on April 14, 2025, prohibiting public education institutions including the Mississippi School of the Arts from establishing DEI offices, requiring DEI statements or training, or teaching content deemed to promote ‘divisive concepts’ related to race, sex, gender identity, or national origin. The law mandates teaching that ‘there are two genders’ and establishes a complaint process with potential withholding of state funding for non-compliance. On August 18, 2025, U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the law, finding it unconstitutionally vague, viewpoint discriminatory, and posing serious threats to free expression and academic freedom. The law remains enjoined pending final resolution of the lawsuit, preventing implementation of its restrictions on educational content and cultural programming.

View
March 31, 2025

Deletion of Race and Gender Databases from State Libraries

Mississippi Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: State libraries

The Mississippi Library Commission ordered permanent deletion of two academic research databases—Race Relations Abstracts and Gender Studies Database—from the MAGNOLIA system, which serves public schools, libraries, universities, and state agencies. Executive Director Hulen Bivins cited Mississippi House Bill 1315 (2023), a law regulating digital resources for minors by prohibiting “obscene” and “sexually oriented” materials, though no specific provision in the law directly addressed academic research databases. The deletion removed access to materials from 377 peer-reviewed journals and collections including professional journals, conference papers, dissertations, and periodicals on topics including ethnic studies, discrimination, gender inequality, and gender identity.

View
March 10, 2025

OverDrive Grant Pause

Missouri Policy Cultural rights

Parties affected: K–12 public school libraries

Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins suspended state funding for OverDrive, a digital library service used by schools and libraries, citing concerns that minors could access inappropriate materials through the platform. The suspension invokes Missouri’s definition of “pornographic for minors” (Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.010(14)), which applies a three-prong test requiring material to appeal to prurient interests, be patently offensive by community standards, and lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. This funding threat pressures schools and libraries to restrict access or implement parental consent requirements, limiting minors’ access to materials with literary and artistic merit that address contested or sensitive themes. The action continues policies initiated by former Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, who established similar library restrictions through administrative rule 15 CSR 30-200.015 in 2023.

View
May 13, 2025

Enactment of House Bill 819, restricting flags on state property

Montana Legislation Freedom of expression

Parties affected: Public property, including schools and universities

Montana’s House Bill 819 restricts flag displays on government property, including public schools and universities, banning flags representing political parties, race, sexual orientation, gender, or political ideology, while explicitly permitting historical flags such as the Gadsden “Don’t Tread on Me” flag and law enforcement flags including the Thin Blue Line flag. The law effectively prohibits Pride flags and Black Lives Matter flags from civic spaces while allowing other ideological symbols, creating selective restrictions on cultural expression based on viewpoint. Critics argue the law targets LGBTQ+ and racial justice communities while privileging other political perspectives under the guise of “neutrality.” Governor Greg Gianforte signed the bill on May 13, 2025.

View
May 12, 2025

House Bill 636 (2025) North Carolina General Assembly

North Carolina Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: K-12 public schools

North Carolina House Bill 636, which passed the House on May 12, 2025, requires public schools to adopt policies for selecting library books that include a community review process allowing residents to object to recommended books. The bill bans books from public schools that include “any descriptions or visual depictions of sexual activity” or are “pervasively vulgar.” The legislation also grants parents, legal guardians of students, and county residents the right to take legal action against public schools over book selections. As of May 2025, the bill has passed the House and is pending in the Senate.

View
May 28, 2025

Proposed Legislation — House Bill 249 (“Indecent Exposure Modernization Act”)

Ohio Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public event venues, libraries, schools

Ohio’s House Bill 249 would criminalize “adult cabaret performances” in any location accessible to minors other than adult cabarets, with the bill defining such performances to include “performers or entertainers who exhibit a gender identity that is different from the performer’s or entertainer’s gender assigned at birth.” The bill imposes penalties ranging from first-degree misdemeanors to fourth-degree felonies depending on whether minors are present and whether the performance is deemed “obscene.” Equality Ohio and LGBTQ+ advocates argue the law would restrict gender-nonconforming performance in public spaces including libraries, parks, and community theaters, threatening artistic expression and cultural visibility. It’s first committee hearing was May 28, 2025, and it remains pending in House Judiciary Committee.

View
March 28, 2025

Enactment of Senate Bill 1 (Advance Ohio Higher Education Act)

Ohio Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public colleges and universities in Ohio

Governor Mike DeWine signed SB 1 into law, prohibiting Ohio’s public universities from maintaining diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or programs, banning faculty strikes, and requiring institutions to affirm they will not “endorse or oppose” any “controversial belief or policy”—defined as any subject of political controversy including foreign policy. While the bill does not explicitly prohibit discussion of controversial topics, it requires faculty to “allow and encourage students to reach their own conclusions” and demonstrate “intellectual diversity” in instruction. An Ohio State art professor reported in March 2025 that a faculty colleague expressed fear of teaching students about Palestinian artists due to concerns the material could be construed as violating the bill’s restrictions, demonstrating a chilling effect on arts education.

View
May 13, 2025

Enactment of Senate Bill 796, banning state funding for DEI programs

Oklahoma Legislation Cultural rights

Parties affected: All public colleges and universities

Governor Kevin Stitt signed Senate Bill 796 into law on May 13, 2025, prohibiting public colleges and universities from using state funds to support diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) positions, departments, activities, procedures, or programs. The law also bans DEI-related hiring statements and mandatory pronoun disclosures, requiring institutions to certify compliance by July 2026. In September 2025, the University of Central Oklahoma canceled a student-directed production of “Boy My Greatness”—a historical drama about boys who played female roles in Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre—citing SB 796 and concerns about the play’s gender-blind casting potentially violating the law.

View
May 1, 2025

Passage of House Bill 1217, criminalizing “obscene” adult performances in public spaces accessible to minors

Oklahoma Legislation Freedom of expression

Parties affected: Public venues, libraries, and cultural institutions

Oklahoma’s legislature passed HB 1217 on May 1, making it a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a $1,000 fine to engage in or permit “adult performances which contain obscene material” on public property or in spaces where minors are present. While the bill text does not explicitly mention drag, Governor Kevin Stitt stated “we’re basically banning drag shows in front of kids” upon signing, and bill sponsors openly targeted drag performances, though Attorney General Gentner Drummond later clarified in a September 2025 opinion that drag itself is not banned unless it contains legally-defined obscene material. The law applies criminal penalties to both performers and municipalities that authorize such performances, with critics warning it creates a chilling effect on Pride events and LGBTQ+ artistic expression in public spaces.

View
March 31, 2025

Enactment of House Bill 1239, “Harmful to Minors”

South Dakota Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public libraries, schools, museums

South Dakota’s HB 1239 requires public and school libraries to install filtering software on computers and establish policies restricting minors’ access to materials deemed “obscene” under state standards that include whether content lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. The law, signed March 31, 2025 and effective July 1, 2025, mandates formal challenge procedures allowing community members to contest materials through library or school board review with potential judicial appeal. Library advocates warn the law’s subjective standards enable ideologically driven challenges that restrict access to legitimate artistic works, creating barriers between minors and diverse literature despite removal of criminal penalties from the original House version.

View
October 31, 2025

Tennessee Secretary of State Orders Statewide Public LIbrary Book Review

Tennessee Policy Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public libraries

On October 31, 2025, Tennessee Secretary of State Tre Hargett ordered Tennessee public libraries to conduct an “immediate age-appropriateness review” of all materials in juvenile children’s sections within 60 days. The directive required libraries to identify materials “inconsistent with Tennessee age-appropriateness laws, in violation of any federal law, including President Trump’s Executive Order, or otherwise contrary to any other applicable state or federal laws.” Libraries were directed to submit final reports by January 19, 2026. The letters threatened loss of state and federal funding and grants for non-compliance and specifically cited Trump’s Executive Order “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” The Rutherford County Library System closed multiple libraries beginning November 6, 2025 to conduct the review, with staff reporting “at least hundreds” of books potentially removed, many with LGBTQ+ themes. Library employees described the process as removing “a mass amount of books in secret” and characterized it as “anti-intellectual freedom and anti-public-library.”

View
June 20, 2025

Enacted Legislation — Senate Bill 12 (DEI Ban in Public Education)

Texas Legislation Cultural rights

Parties affected: K-12 public schools

On June 20, 2025, Governor Greg Abbott signed SB 12, banning diversity, equity, and inclusion activities in Texas K-12 public schools, effective September 1. The legislation prohibits schools from organizing programming, clubs, trainings, or curricula that reference race, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation except where required by federal law. Gay-Straight Alliance clubs have been banned statewide, and at Booker T. Washington High School for the Performing and Visual Arts in Dallas, the law has led to club renamings and created uncertainty among educators about whether student art addressing LGBTQIA+ themes may be displayed. Educators at the arts magnet school reported that students and faculty are struggling to navigate restrictions on identity-based expression, with concerns that the law is affecting the school’s culture of artistic freedom.

View
May 2, 2025

Passage of Senate Bill 412 (Harmful Material Law)

Texas Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public libraries, schools, and cultural institutions

Texas Senate Bill 412 eliminates the educational exemption that previously protected teachers and librarians from prosecution under the state’s harmful material law. The law criminalizes knowingly distributing broadly defined “harmful” materials to minors, with penalties including up to one year in jail and a $4,000 fine (Class A misdemeanor), or 2-10 years in prison and up to $10,000 fine if a minor is used to commit the offense (third-degree felony). The law’s vague language has prompted significant self-censorship in educational settings regarding materials addressing sexuality, gender, and race.

View
March 5, 2025

Senate passed SB 13 altering library book approval

Texas Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: K–12 school libraries statewide

Texas SB 13 requires school boards to approve all library acquisitions and establishes a framework for parent-led advisory councils (triggered by petition from 50 parents or 10% of parents, whichever is less) to review materials and make recommendations reflecting “local community values.” The law, effective September 1, 2025, mandates immediate removal of challenged books pending board review and prohibits materials with undefined “profane” or “indecent” content. Library and education groups describe the law as creating delays and barriers to student access to literature, centralizing political control over library collections through multiple approval layers and vague content restrictions. Districts have already begun removing or restricting books under the new framework, with early implementation affecting tens of thousands of titles across multiple school systems.

View
February 28, 2025

Budget Freeze Threat Over DEI Compliance

Texas Policy Academic freedom

Parties affected: All public universities

Texas Senators Brandon Creighton and Paul Bettencourt sent a letter to university boards of regents threatening to freeze funding increases at previous biennium levels unless institutions certify full compliance with Senate Bill 17, the 2023 law banning DEI offices, programs, hiring, and training. The letter alleges “numerous instances” of noncompliance and warns that failure to demonstrate adherence will result in “full enforcement of mechanisms available to the Legislature, including impacts to your funding requests.” SB 17 previously eliminated cultural programming at Texas universities, including cultural graduation ceremonies, welcome weeks for students of color (New Black Student Weekend, Adelante, CultivAsian), and multicultural engagement centers. The funding threat reinforces restrictions on cultural inclusion infrastructure at public universities.

View
February 28, 2025

Board of Regents vote to ban drag performances

Texas Policy Academic freedom

Parties affected: Texas A&M University System

The Board of Regents of the Texas A&M University System—a government-appointed body—voted to ban all drag performances on its campuses, following political pressure aligned with recent federal executive orders opposing “gender ideology.” The ban applied even to student-organized events like Draggieland. A federal court issued a preliminary injunction on March 24 allowing the show to proceed, citing likely constitutional violations. On August 18, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled the drag ban likely unconstitutional, affirming that such performances are protected expressive conduct and suspending enforcement of the policy across public campuses.

View
October 16, 2025

Draft Bill Banning “Sexually Explicit” Books in School Libraries

Wyoming Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public libraries

On October 16, 2025, Wyoming’s Joint Judiciary Committee voted 11-2 to advance a draft bill that would ban books with “sexually explicit” content from school libraries and require public libraries to move such books to adult-only sections. The bill defines “sexually explicit” to encompass all written or illustrated depictions of sexual activity involving genitalia, regardless of artistic or literary context. Books targeted for removal include young adult literature addressing LGBTQ+ identity and trauma recovery, such as “Gender Queer” and “Lawn Boy.” The bill requires a two-thirds vote in the Wyoming House or Senate to be introduced in the February 2026 legislative session.

View
March 4, 2025

Enactment of House Bill 147 (Enrolled Act 67), banning DEI programs and instruction promoting “institutional discrimination”

Wyoming Legislation Academic freedom

Parties affected: Public Universities

Wyoming’s House Bill 147 (Enrolled Act 67) prohibits all governmental entities—including the University of Wyoming, public community colleges, school districts, and local governments—from engaging in diversity, equity, and inclusion programs or requiring instruction that “promotes institutional discrimination” based on race, color, religion, sex, ethnicity, or national origin. Education stakeholders testified the law creates a “chilling effect” in classrooms, with the Wyoming School Boards Association stating teachers wouldn’t be able to teach Supreme Court cases like Brown v. Board of Education, and the Wyoming Education Association arguing it disproportionately impacts social studies and history teachers. PEN America characterized the law as prohibiting “a range of government programs,” potentially including cultural and artistic programs. Governor Mark Gordon signed the law on March 4, 2025, and it took effect July 1, 2025.

View

Federal Level Interferences

Read through the timeline of federal interferences that stifle artistic freedom.

interferences found

All Articles

  • June 2, 2025

    FY2026 Full Budget Proposal: NEA Elimination and DOE Arts Program Cuts

    PolicyAcademic freedom

    Parties affected: Department of Education

    On May 30, 2025, the Trump administration released its detailed FY2026 budget proposal, reaffirming plans to eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts and consolidating the Department of Education’s Assistance for Arts Education program into a new K-12 block grant with 69% reduced funding. The proposal redirects education resources toward “core subjects” including math, reading, science, and history. Arts advocates warn these cuts threaten equitable access to arts education, particularly in under-resourced districts.

    View
  • May 20, 2025

    Secretarial Order 3431 — Implementing Executive Order 14253 (“Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History”)

    PolicyCultural rights

    Parties affected: U.S. National Park Service and affiliated DOI-managed cultural sites (e.g. museums, historic trails, monuments)

    On May 20, 2025, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued Secretarial Order 3431, instructing the National Park Service and other Interior-managed cultural sites to remove or revise all content, signage, imagery, descriptions, depictions, and narratives that “innappropriately disparage Americans past or present” in line with Executive Order 14253. The order resulted in the removal of historical content related to slavery and Indigenous resistance at several park sites. Notable examples include the removal of “The Scourged Back” exhibit at Fort Pulaski National Monument (GA), along with the deletion of climate-change signage at Acadia National Park (ME) and the alteration of Indigenous-history displays at Muir Woods National Monument (CA) and Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (NY).

    View
  • May 8, 2025

    Abrupt dismissal of Librarian of Congress Dr. Carla Hayden

    PolicyAcademic freedom

    Parties affected: Library of Congress

    On May 8, 2025, President Trump abruptly dismissed Dr. Carla Hayden as Librarian of Congress. No formal cause was initially given, but the White House later accused Hayden of “pursuing DEI initiatives” and “placing inappropriate books in the library for children.” The removal came before the end of her 10-year term and provoked widespread concern about executive interference in the independence of the Library of Congress, a constitutionally created cultural and archival institution charged with preserving nonpartisan access to knowledge and the arts. Critics warned that such politicized removals threaten institutional independence and set a precedent for executive interference in national cultural governance.

    View
  • May 2, 2025

    NEA Rescinds Grants Following Proposed Budget Cuts

    PolicyCultural rights

    Parties affected: Arts organizations nationwide

    On May 2, 2025, the National Endowment for the Arts sent termination and withdrawal notices to hundreds of arts organizations nationwide, effective May 31, 2025. The emails stated the NEA was “updating its grantmaking policy priorities to focus funding on projects that reflect the nation’s rich artistic heritage and creativity as prioritized by the President.” Organizations affected included theater companies, literary magazines, dance groups, museums, and festivals of all types, with grants ranging from $10,000 to $100,000. The widespread cancellations raised concerns about censorship and the chilling of artistic expression across diverse communities.

    View
  • May 2, 2025

    FY2026 ‘Skinny Budget’ Proposal to Eliminate NEA, NEH, and IMLS

    PolicyCultural rights

    Parties affected: NEA, NEH, IMLS, and their grantees nationwide

    On May 2, 2025, the Trump administration released its FY2026 “skinny budget” proposal, calling for the complete elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts, National Endowment for the Humanities, and Institute of Museum and Library Services. The proposal also indicated a 15% cut to the Department of Education, with plans to consolidate multiple K-12 grant programs. Arts advocates warn that eliminating federal arts funding would devastate cultural organizations and reduce access to arts education nationwide.

    View
  • May 1, 2025

    Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media: EO 14290

    PolicyCultural rights

    Parties affected: NPR, PBS, and ~ 1,500 affiliated public media stations nationwide

    On May 1, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order directing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to cease all direct and indirect federal funding to NPR and PBS, citing alleged political bias. The order affects approximately 1,500 local public radio and television stations nationwide that rely on CPB funding for educational and cultural programming, particularly in rural and underserved communities. CPB, PBS, and NPR have stated the order is unlawful, arguing that CPB is a congressionally created independent entity not subject to presidential authority, and filed suits on first amendment and other grounds. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting distributes approximately $535 million annually in federal funds to public media.

    View
  • April 2, 2025

    USCIS Policy Limiting Gender Recognition to “Biological Sex” at Birth

    PolicyCultural rights

    Parties affected: LGBTQ+ work visa applicants (O-1, P-1, P-3, etc.)

    On April 2, 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) updated its Policy Manual to recognize only two “biological sexes”—male and female—based on birth certificates issued at or near time of birth, pursuant to Executive Order 14168 “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” signed January 20, 2025. The policy eliminates the “X” gender marker option and requires all immigration benefit applications to indicate sex as male or female based on birth records. The policy directly impacts transgender and nonbinary artists, including US citizens and those applying for O-1, P-1, P-3, and other work visas. Canadian musician Bells Larsen, whose album explores trans experience, canceled his June 2025 U.S. tour after receiving guidance from the American Federation of Musicians that applicants with gender markers changed from birth certificates would face visa difficulties. The policy applies to all pending and new applications filed on or after April 2, 2025.

    View
  • April 1, 2025

    Department of Government Efficiency Restructuring Initiative (EO: 14222)

    PolicyAcademic freedom

    Parties affected: National Endowment for the Humanities

    In early April 2025, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) directed the National Endowment for the Humanities to terminate over 1,400 grants, including all fiscal year 2025 funding to state humanities councils, affecting museums, libraries, historic sites, and cultural programs nationwide. The grant cancellations, which totaled approximately $175 million in undisbursed funds, were issued via late-night emails on April 2, 2025. Federal courts later ruled the cancellations unlawful, though funding remains blocked pending litigation.

    View
  • March 27, 2025

    Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History: EO 14253

    PolicyAcademic freedom

    Parties affected: Smithsonian Institution

    On March 27, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14253 titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” directing the Smithsonian Institution to remove exhibits and programming deemed to contain “improper ideology” or content that “inappropriately disparages Americans.” The order specifically cited “The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture” at the Smithsonian American Art Museum as an example of divisive content, claiming it portrayed American and Western values as “inherently harmful and oppressive.” The order directed the Vice President and Office of Management and Budget to work with Congress to ensure future Smithsonian appropriations prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that “degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy.” Historians, museum professionals, and members of Congress condemned the directive as political censorship of federally supported cultural institutions and an infringement on the Smithsonian’s independence to carry out its educational mission.

    View
  • March 25, 2025

    State Department Cable: Mandatory Social Media Vetting for F, M, and J Visa Applicants

    PolicyCultural rights

    Parties affected: All F-1, M-1, and J-1 visa applicants

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a cable titled “Action Request: Enhanced Screening and Social Media Vetting for Visa Applicants” requiring consular officers to refer all F-1 (academic student), J-1 (exchange visitor), and M-1 (vocational student) visa applicants to Fraud Prevention Units for mandatory social media checks. The cable requires consular officers to refer all F-1, M-1, and J-1 visa applicants to Fraud Prevention Units for mandatory social media checks, with particular focus on applicants who held student/exchange visas between October 7, 2023 and August 31, 2024. Officers must screen for terrorism-related ineligibilities, which the cable states may be evident in ‘conduct that bears a hostile attitude toward U.S. citizens or U.S. culture (including government, institutions, or founding principles). This policy directly impacts international students attending U.S. conservatories, theater programs, and arts universities, as well as cultural exchange participants including musicians, dancers, visual artists, and theater practitioners participating in J-1 exchange programs. The requirement creates a chilling effect on artistic and political expression as a condition for visa eligibility. The New York Times reported that more than 800 students lost their visas as a result of this policy as of April 2025.

    View
  • March 4, 2025

    Congressional Budgetary Threat

    PolicyCultural rights

    Parties affected: Black Lives Matter Plaza (Washington, D.C.)

    In 2025, Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) introduced legislation threatening to withhold at least $185 million in federal transportation funds from Washington, D.C. unless the city removed the “Black Lives Matter” mural and renamed the plaza “Liberty Plaza.” Mayor Muriel Bowser announced on March 4 that the city would paint over the mural, and removal began March 10, with the mayor stating the city could not “afford to be distracted by meaningless congressional interference.” Critics characterized the funding threat as federal coercion to suppress local artistic and political expression.

    View
  • February 14, 2025

    Park Service erases ‘transgender’ on Stonewall website

    PolicyCultural rights

    Parties affected: Stonewall National Monument (National Park Service)

    On February 14, 2025, the National Park Service removed all references to “transgender” and “queer” from the Stonewall National Monument website, changing “LGBTQ+” to “LGB” and erasing mentions of transgender activists Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera who were central to the 1969 uprising. The Park Service stated the changes were made to comply with Trump executive orders on “restoring biological truth to the federal government.” The Stonewall Inn and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups condemned the action as a “blatant act of erasure” that distorts the history of the first U.S. national monument dedicated to LGBTQ+ rights and dishonors transgender contributions to the movement. Weeks later, the NPS also removed entire web pages dedicated to transgender activists from the site.

    View

How to use The Monitor

Interact with the data

The interactive features of our platform include a timeline and state map that tracks executive actions, legislation, and policies that limit artistic freedom at the federal and state levels. You can explore entries by theme – like LGBTQ+ rights or cultural rights – or browse chronologically. The platform is regularly updated and serves as a resource for artists, researchers, advocates, and the general public committed to defending freedom of expression.

Read our analysis

AFM complements the tracker with Spotlight, a series of ground-level reports that document how policy shifts and governance interventions are experienced in practice. These reports are built from qualitative reporting with artists, arts NGOs, museums, libraries, universities, presenters, and other cultural institutions, capturing the real-world effects of laws, funding decisions, administrative measures, and governance changes on programming, staffing, institutional autonomy, and creative expression. By pairing policy documentation with field reporting, Spotlight helps the public understand not only what has changed on paper, but what those changes mean for cultural life on the ground.

Take action

AFM is not only a monitoring tool—it is a launchpad for accountability and protection. The Strategic Action arm of AFM translates the evidence base into concrete interventions, including: Strategic litigation where government actions unlawfully restrict artistic freedom or institutional independence; and Model legislation and policy proposals designed to strengthen safeguards for the cultural sector and reinforce institutional independence, transparency, and viewpoint-neutral governance.

Give us feedback

Help us improve the Artistic Freedom Monitor. Use this form to report errors in our database, technical issues, or share feedback on your experience with the platform.