On August 25, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14341, titled “Prosecuting Burning of the American Flag,” directing the Department of Justice to prioritize prosecution of flag desecration when it coincides with violations of existing federal, state, or local laws, and instructing the Attorney General to pursue litigation to challenge First Amendment protections established in Texas v. Johnson (1989). The order also directs the State Department and Department of Homeland Security to deny, revoke, or terminate visas, residence permits, and naturalization proceedings for foreign nationals who engage in flag desecration. While the order focuses on protest activity, its broad language regarding “flag desecration” and targeting of foreign nationals could create a chilling effect on symbolic and artistic expression, particularly among immigrant artists and cultural workers engaging in political or protest-themed work. Civil liberties organizations immediately challenged the order as unconstitutional selective enforcement of protected speech.

On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Mahmoud v. Taylor that schools must notify parents and allow religious opt-outs from lessons using LGBTQ-themed storybooks. The decision creates legal and financial incentives for schools to preemptively remove LGBTQ+ literature from classrooms to avoid lawsuits, effectively restricting students’ access to diverse cultural expression and limiting their ability to participate in literary education that reflects varied identities and experiences. Justice Sotomayor’s dissent warned the ruling would have a “chilling effect” that leads to censorship of artistic and cultural materials in school curricula nationwide.

On May 20, 2025, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued Secretarial Order 3431, instructing the National Park Service and other Interior-managed cultural sites to remove or revise all content, signage, imagery, descriptions, depictions, and narratives that “innappropriately disparage Americans past or present” in line with Executive Order 14253. The order resulted in the removal of historical content related to slavery and Indigenous resistance at several park sites. Notable examples include the removal of “The Scourged Back” exhibit at Fort Pulaski National Monument (GA), along with the deletion of climate-change signage at Acadia National Park (ME) and the alteration of Indigenous-history displays at Muir Woods National Monument (CA) and Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (NY).

On March 27, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14253 titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” directing the Smithsonian Institution to remove exhibits and programming deemed to contain “improper ideology” or content that “inappropriately disparages Americans.” The order specifically cited “The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture” at the Smithsonian American Art Museum as an example of divisive content, claiming it portrayed American and Western values as “inherently harmful and oppressive.” The order directed the Vice President and Office of Management and Budget to work with Congress to ensure future Smithsonian appropriations prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that “degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy.” Historians, museum professionals, and members of Congress condemned the directive as political censorship of federally supported cultural institutions and an infringement on the Smithsonian’s independence to carry out its educational mission.

In 2025, Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) introduced legislation threatening to withhold at least $185 million in federal transportation funds from Washington, D.C. unless the city removed the “Black Lives Matter” mural and renamed the plaza “Liberty Plaza.” Mayor Muriel Bowser announced on March 4 that the city would paint over the mural, and removal began March 10, with the mayor stating the city could not “afford to be distracted by meaningless congressional interference.” Critics characterized the funding threat as federal coercion to suppress local artistic and political expression.

On February 7, 2025 President Trump fired Colleen Shogan as head of the National Archives and Records Administration, marking the first time a sitting president has removed the National Archivist since the position was established in the 1930s. The firing represented an unprecedented assertion of presidential authority over an independent federal agency responsible for preserving and presenting American historical records and cultural heritage. While Trump cited the Archives’ role in the classified documents investigation, the removal occurred amid ongoing controversy over Shogan’s October 2024 directive to staff to remove or minimize exhibits on slavery, civil rights leaders, Japanese-American internment, and Indigenous displacement. Historians and civil rights organizations condemned the firing as political interference in a nonpartisan cultural institution responsible for safeguarding the nation’s historical record.

In response to Executive Order 14151 (January 20, 2025), which mandated termination of all federal DEI programs and equity-related grants, the NEA cancelled its Challenge America grant program on February 6, 2025. Challenge America had supported small arts organizations serving underserved communities. The NEA revised its 2026 grant guidelines to prohibit DEI programs and “gender ideology,” prioritize America250 projects, and require a five-year organizational history. Organizations with pending applications were required to resubmit under the new criteria. Critics condemned the changes as censorship that imposed ideological conditions on arts funding. The ACLU and several other organizations filed suit against the NEA over its cancellation of funding arguing that The lawsuit argues that the grant-guidance restrictions—particularly the requirement that applicants avoid “promoting gender ideology”—unconstitutionally violate the First Amendment and exceed the agency’s lawful authority.

Executive Order 14188, signed January 29, 2025, directed federal agencies to identify authorities to combat anti-Semitism and included provisions for universities to monitor and report non-citizen student activities that could lead to removal proceedings. The order’s text does not explicitly restrict artistic freedom or direct deportations. However, federal authorities have used the order as a pretext to restrict the legitimate and peaceful expression of students participating in campus protests. Authorities revoked over 1,500 international student visas across at least 32 states and detained multiple students involved in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Civil liberties organizations have challenged these actions as unconstitutional violations of free speech and assembly rights.

Executive Order 14151, signed January 20, 2025, directed all federal agencies to terminate “all discriminatory programs, including illegal DEI and ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities,” as well as all “equity-related” grants and contracts within 60 days. The order had implications for arts and culture agencies that receive federal funding, as it required them to review and revise grant programs and compliance requirements. Arts organizations expressed uncertainty over how the order would affect their eligibility for federal funding and which programs might be subject to termination. Executive Order 14151 has been challenged in court on First Amendment grounds, with plaintiffs arguing that its restrictions on DEI-related programs amount to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and suppression of protected speech.

President Trump issued an executive order reforming the federal accreditation process for higher education institutions. The order directed accrediting bodies to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) standards, which the administration characterized as “unlawful discrimination,” and to prioritize “intellectual diversity” among faculty. It instructed the Secretary of Education to investigate and potentially terminate accreditors that require DEI-related practices or who fail to maintain and “intellectually diverse” staff. Academic organizations warned the order could lead to government interference in institutional decision-making at universities, raising concerns about restrictions on cultural programming and curricula, particularly those addressing diversity, race, and gender.